Search Site
Tax Consequences of a Settlement in a Tort Action

Tax Consequences of a Settlement in a Tort Action

When a plaintiff and a defendant enter into a settlement of a tort action, the tax consequences of the settlement will depend upon whether the damages are allocated in the settlement agreement. In other words, the key question is whether the plaintiff and the defendant have set forth the amount that is to be paid for the plaintiff's pain and suffering, past and future medical expenses, or punitive damages.

A settlement agreement should set forth the amount that is allocated for a plaintiff's personal or physical injuries, such as pain and suffering or medical expenses, and the amount that is allocated for the plaintiff's non-physical injuries, such as lost wages or lost profits. The plaintiff's personal or physical injuries are generally not taxable to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's non-physical injuries are generally taxable to the plaintiff. The settlement agreement should also allocate amounts that are paid for punitive damages because punitive damages are generally taxable to the plaintiff.

If a settlement agreement includes damages for past and future medical expenses, the agreement should allocate the past medical expenses and the future medical expenses. If the medical expenses are not allocated, a plaintiff may not be entitled to deduct past medical expenses on his or her current income tax return or to deduct future medical expenses on his or her future income tax returns.

If a plaintiff has been awarded prejudgment interest under a settlement agreement, the agreement should contain an allocation for the interest. Although prejudgment interest is generally taxable to a plaintiff, a defendant may be entitled to deduct the interest on his or her income tax return.

Court's Role

If a settlement agreement does not allocate a plaintiff's damages in a tort action, a court will determine the nature of the plaintiff's claim and the intent of the defendant in agreeing to pay damages to the plaintiff. The plaintiff's complaint will be examined in order to determine the type of damages that have been awarded to the plaintiff. The court and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will generally allocate the damages in the same ratio as the damages were alleged in the plaintiff's complaint.

If a settlement agreement does not allocate a plaintiff's damages in a tort action, the plaintiff has the burden of proving how much of his or her damages were awarded for physical injuries and how much were awarded for punitive damages. If a settlement agreement allocates the plaintiff's damages, the IRS will generally recognize the allocation unless it considers the allocation to be unreasonable. If the IRS considers the allocation to be unreasonable, the plaintiff has the burden of substantiating the allocation. If the plaintiff does not meet that burden, all of the plaintiff's damages will be included in the plaintiff's gross income.

When a court has approved a settlement agreement, the IRS may look more favorably on the allocation of damages in the agreement. However, the allocation of damages is not binding on the IRS.

Copyright 2014 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc.

Contact us

Please fill out the form below and one of our attorneys will contact you.

Quick Contact Form

  • "-All what I can say is that I had a great lawyer and an excellent representative for my workman’s comps case. Definitely I would recommend the services of Attorney Graham. Abdeslam C."  -Abdeslam C.

  • "-Attorney Kimberly Graham went above and beyond on my behalf. She not only offered legal advice, but also provided personal support. This was in no way an easy battle, but with her by my side it made a difference. Portia W. "  -Portia W.

  • "-She cares for her clients. Andrew W."  -Andrew W.

  • "-Kimberly Graham exemplifies qualities of expertise and professionalism. I would hire her services again if they were to be needed. Thank you so very much Atty Kim. Donna W."  -Donna W.

  • "-Really great work and communication. Great person better lawyer. David S."  -David S.

  • "-It was great working with attorney Graham and her staff. I would highly recommend her. Kelly N."  -Kelly N.

  • "-My experience with Atty Graham and her staff was very professional. I would gladly recommend her firm to others. John S."  -John S.

  • "-Attorney Graham took on a task that was not in her line of expertise and excelled. She put forth 150% of her time and knowledge to assist us in meeting our obligations as co-conservators and then administrators of our cousin’s estate. She made it easy. She gave us the guidance we needed to succeed in all the legal papers. Attorney Graham is not just an attorney to our family, she has become a very dear friend. P.S. The staff was friendly, helpful and professional. Maxine S.; John S."  -Maxine S.; John S.

  • "-All I have to say is the best and I am going to recommend everybody about the quality of Kimberly Graham and her staff. Edin J."  -Edin J.

  • "-I want to thank Kimberly Graham & her staff for all their help. I’m so grateful for everything she did for me & I will always thank God for her help. And I will make sure that anyone I know will know what a good attorney she is. I will recommend her to everyone I know. Thank you Kimberly. Keep up the good work. Maria C."  -Maria C.

West Hartford Office
  • 28 North Main St
    Suite G-2
    West Hartford, Connecticut 06107
    Phone: 860-523-9306
    Fax: 860-523-1274